<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language is Vital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.biguniverse.com/2009/07/21/language-is-vital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.biguniverse.com/2009/07/21/language-is-vital/</link>
	<description>Big Universe Learning - Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bollard</title>
		<link>http://blog.biguniverse.com/2009/07/21/language-is-vital/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biguniverse.com/?p=343#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Bernice,

My apologies if I wasn&#039;t particularly clear.  I&#039;m not necessarily saying I agree with research on computers.  In fact, as a person who makes a career out of computing, I don&#039;t.  I did however find it interesting that the research would conclude this and it may even be true for the more capable child. If anything though, I can guarantee that computer time, even on non-educational games, is critical for development in special needs children. 

My comments on video aren&#039;t backed up by research, they are a matter of opinion.  Barney is good but my issue there is that sometimes I see parents who are to restrictive with their children. Restriction is fine when done for reasons of censorship but not when it is because they feel a plot may be too &quot;difficult&quot;.  That&#039;s the &quot;remedial effect&quot; at work - when parents underestimate their child&#039;s abilities and don&#039;t provide adequate material for growth. My point is simply that a broad range of experience is more helpful than an narrow one.

I certainly don&#039;t disagree with your writing - except for the word &quot;slugger&quot; which I had to look up and am still not sure what it means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernice,</p>
<p>My apologies if I wasn&#8217;t particularly clear.  I&#8217;m not necessarily saying I agree with research on computers.  In fact, as a person who makes a career out of computing, I don&#8217;t.  I did however find it interesting that the research would conclude this and it may even be true for the more capable child. If anything though, I can guarantee that computer time, even on non-educational games, is critical for development in special needs children. </p>
<p>My comments on video aren&#8217;t backed up by research, they are a matter of opinion.  Barney is good but my issue there is that sometimes I see parents who are to restrictive with their children. Restriction is fine when done for reasons of censorship but not when it is because they feel a plot may be too &#8220;difficult&#8221;.  That&#8217;s the &#8220;remedial effect&#8221; at work &#8211; when parents underestimate their child&#8217;s abilities and don&#8217;t provide adequate material for growth. My point is simply that a broad range of experience is more helpful than an narrow one.</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t disagree with your writing &#8211; except for the word &#8220;slugger&#8221; which I had to look up and am still not sure what it means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernice Wonderly</title>
		<link>http://blog.biguniverse.com/2009/07/21/language-is-vital/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernice Wonderly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biguniverse.com/?p=343#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Hi Gavin and thank you for your response. I do understand what you are saying and I&#039;ve heard that argument before. However, I have to disagree with the computer/television component. I&#039;m sure you know too that one can come up with any hypothesis these days and find the research to back it up. But, having worked with children with language problems I find video and the computer to be extremely helpful in developing language.

I believe the thought behind the argument against computers and television is that there is no verbal communication taking place during the actual process of video viewing or computer activity, but I don&#039;t think language can be considered completely verbal. Language begins long before the mouth opens and the words come out. Language begins deep in the brain where the thoughts form. Without the thoughts, without the knowledge there can be no words. Children who come from severe poverty or environments where there is little to no stimulation have little language. They come to school with little background knowledge. They have little to speak, talk about, or write about. There is not language to put forth.

The brain is fast at work when a child is working on the computer, whether for educational purposes or during a computer game. When a child is watching Barney they are learning by listening and I know this from personal experience. Children absorb like a sponge and are able to repeat much of what they hear on television especially when it&#039;s presented in an entertaining, age appropriate format. 

Children need to be spoken to daily and often but there&#039;s nothing wrong with the computer and video or television for some support and instruction. In fact I believe using the computer actually boosts a child&#039;s ability to learn because it&#039;s an interactive tool. Given the right environment the child can see, feel and sometimes hear the tool he is working with. The more senses involved the better. 

Language comes after many experiences. Reading and talking are definitely a necessity in every child&#039;s life. So are experiences. Children need to experience life. For some children this can only happen through video, television and computer. Using these devices effectively a teacher can bring the world to a child who is unable to go to the world. It&#039;s not the same but for some children, there isn&#039;t anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gavin and thank you for your response. I do understand what you are saying and I&#8217;ve heard that argument before. However, I have to disagree with the computer/television component. I&#8217;m sure you know too that one can come up with any hypothesis these days and find the research to back it up. But, having worked with children with language problems I find video and the computer to be extremely helpful in developing language.</p>
<p>I believe the thought behind the argument against computers and television is that there is no verbal communication taking place during the actual process of video viewing or computer activity, but I don&#8217;t think language can be considered completely verbal. Language begins long before the mouth opens and the words come out. Language begins deep in the brain where the thoughts form. Without the thoughts, without the knowledge there can be no words. Children who come from severe poverty or environments where there is little to no stimulation have little language. They come to school with little background knowledge. They have little to speak, talk about, or write about. There is not language to put forth.</p>
<p>The brain is fast at work when a child is working on the computer, whether for educational purposes or during a computer game. When a child is watching Barney they are learning by listening and I know this from personal experience. Children absorb like a sponge and are able to repeat much of what they hear on television especially when it&#8217;s presented in an entertaining, age appropriate format. </p>
<p>Children need to be spoken to daily and often but there&#8217;s nothing wrong with the computer and video or television for some support and instruction. In fact I believe using the computer actually boosts a child&#8217;s ability to learn because it&#8217;s an interactive tool. Given the right environment the child can see, feel and sometimes hear the tool he is working with. The more senses involved the better. </p>
<p>Language comes after many experiences. Reading and talking are definitely a necessity in every child&#8217;s life. So are experiences. Children need to experience life. For some children this can only happen through video, television and computer. Using these devices effectively a teacher can bring the world to a child who is unable to go to the world. It&#8217;s not the same but for some children, there isn&#8217;t anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bollard</title>
		<link>http://blog.biguniverse.com/2009/07/21/language-is-vital/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biguniverse.com/?p=343#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Yes, language is critical.  It&#039;s something the pediatricians often say when dealing with children who have a variety of issues (eg: temper tantrums, potty issues).  Get the language sorted first, and everything else will follow.

Interestingly, some recent (and large-sample) studies have shown that time on computers and computer games is actually detrimental to language learning.  Computers are a great visual learning tool but they&#039;re no substitute for reading and talking in everyday life.

Similarly, television viewing needs to be examined too.  Television shows like Barney adopt only a very limited range of expression.  Similarly, many adult-orientated action shows rely more on cliches and grunts than on real expression.  Consider exposing your children to quality films which display a range of emotions and expressive language.  Even better, leave the subtitles on, so that they begin to recognise words.

Books are the best learning resources for written language but often children with reading difficulties are unable easily progress past the most basic written language.  This should not be accepted as a limitation.  Instead, read older books to your children and/or if you feel too tired to read, consider obtaining childrens audio-books and playing one chapter per night to them. It won&#039;t help with their &quot;reading skills&quot; which they&#039;ll still need to practice but it will help them to develop better &quot;written expression&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, language is critical.  It&#8217;s something the pediatricians often say when dealing with children who have a variety of issues (eg: temper tantrums, potty issues).  Get the language sorted first, and everything else will follow.</p>
<p>Interestingly, some recent (and large-sample) studies have shown that time on computers and computer games is actually detrimental to language learning.  Computers are a great visual learning tool but they&#8217;re no substitute for reading and talking in everyday life.</p>
<p>Similarly, television viewing needs to be examined too.  Television shows like Barney adopt only a very limited range of expression.  Similarly, many adult-orientated action shows rely more on cliches and grunts than on real expression.  Consider exposing your children to quality films which display a range of emotions and expressive language.  Even better, leave the subtitles on, so that they begin to recognise words.</p>
<p>Books are the best learning resources for written language but often children with reading difficulties are unable easily progress past the most basic written language.  This should not be accepted as a limitation.  Instead, read older books to your children and/or if you feel too tired to read, consider obtaining childrens audio-books and playing one chapter per night to them. It won&#8217;t help with their &#8220;reading skills&#8221; which they&#8217;ll still need to practice but it will help them to develop better &#8220;written expression&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
